Saturday, November 30, 2013

Another Word for 'Halfwit' is 'Liberal'

 I remember the good, old days when I'd would pick up my handy Dictionary to look up a word. The definition would be neutral, cold, and accurate. My Thesaurus was the same way.  For over forty years, I could trust these writing tools to give me fact-based information. That is, until recently while using my iMac from Apple.

 I was wondering what the definition of 'liberal' was. My Macintosh computer comes equipped with 'widgets', including a Dictionary and Thesaurus. I know Progressives have poisoned textbooks with biased information, but I didn't know they got a hold of Apple's widgets.













That's not skewed at all! 
I couldn't believe how obvious it was. 
I had to look up 'conservative' to see if the word was given a positive tone as well. I'll let you be the judge.













Sad.
Every kid with an iPad is going to think liberals are kind and approachable while conservatives are unfriendly and archaic. We need to let the young people of today know conservatives are not what liberals claim we are.




Monday, August 26, 2013

On the Wrong Side Again

I wish America had stayed out of the whole "Arab Spring" BS. I felt that way then and I feel the same now. Gaddafi was a tyrant, but at least he was a quiet one. It all started with the no-fly zone over Libya (thanks Hillary). We no longer have the funds to be the enforcer of the world. Not only that, they HATE us.
Our alliance should have been to our true allies - Israel.
When the Arab Spring started to take place, we should have OK'd the Keystone Pipeline, doubled down on our own resources - including Alaska.

I am SICK of what is happening to the Coptic Christians in Egypt. It's no secret that the Muslim Brotherhood is behind the church burning and murders of Christians. If ever we were to get involved, the time would be NOW in helping the Christians vacate Egypt....and that's all.

Our president is friends with the Muslim Brotherhood (to say the least). He's a traitor to this country and he should be IMPEACHED.




Our president is on the wrong side of this catastrophe in the Middle East.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Keep it Simple Stupak

It's March 2012, the second anniversary of when our wonderful president took a bill that no one read and shoved it down the throats of the American people. Shall we celebrate? Well, we can celebrate that the Supreme Court will be ruling on Obamacare's Constitutionality. Just the fact that it had to go to the Supreme Court shows how widely controversial the law is. As much as I respect the SCOTUS and appreciate that our forefathers had the foresight to appoint a high court, I have doubts they are unbiased. After all, Barack Obama appointed Elena Kagen to the court after she acted as his attorney before she was appointed. But who's paying attention, right? Definitely not the media. Everything about this law makes my skin crawl. Even the parts that sounded good left me wondering, where is the catch? There always was one.

I remember Obama selling his health care bill. He gave the same talking points over and over: "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor", "Health care premium costs will go down" and "Taxes will not go up one single dime. We will pay for the law by cutting the waste and fraud from Medicare". It sounded great! It sounded too good to be true. It was. My husband and I have seen our insurance premiums go up three times since the bill was passed into law. Our copays are higher too. The CBO recently reported that Obamacare is going to cost taxpayers a lot more than originally stated. As Congressman Paul Ryan said during that infamous "Health Care Summit", the bill was full of schemes, smoke and mirrors. In short? Obama lied. We were duped. Well, not all of us. There was the Tea Party that held peaceful protests. There also was a good number of us writing, calling and faxing congressmen in hopes of swaying their decisions.

The American people were not the only victims of the deception. There were so many members of Congress who were given promises and probably threats too. There is one that particularly stands out to me. Two years later, we never even hear his name mentioned anymore - Bart Stupak. Congressman Stupak was a Democrat who had strong convictions about abortion. He was sort of the leader of a small group who would not agree to the bill if included government-funded abortions - the "Stupak 11". Stupak was firm; he wanted that part of the bill changed or he wouldn't agree. There were countless interviews with Stupak on television where he stated his views about abortion.

Stupak must have actually been one of the few who read the bill. He found a clause which stated, "$1 per month for all enrollees must go into a fund for reproductive care which includes abortion coverage." He was criticized by many of his fellow Democrats. He insisted that the language had to be changed. Stupak said, "We're not going to bypass some principles and beliefs that we feel strongly about." The pressure was on.

It was announced that the House was going to take a vote on a Sunday, March 21st. All the pundits were saying that Nancy Pelosi wouldn't have called for a vote if she didn't have the numbers. I remember it was more stressful than a tied basketball game with thirty seconds on the clock. We were glued to our T.V. sets. The Democrats seemed to be scrambling; they didn't have all the votes yet. It looked like it was over when there was announcement. Bart Stupak and his gang would vote in favor of the bill. President Obama promised to write an executive order stating that the Affordable Care Act would not fund abortions.

I was shocked; an executive order? Could he do that? Yes, but if the language in the bill was not changed, there was no guarantee abortions wouldn't be government-funded. How could Stupak agree to an Executive Order?

It's been over three years since the Affordable Care Act was passed - or should I say - shoved down the throats of the American people. October 1st of this year, Americans will start to sign up for the "exchanges" in their state. However, only seventeen states have set up the exchanges. That's not even half of the country! The federal government will manage the exchanges in the other thirty-three states.
But will the law pay for abortions?

In the usual political jargon of the Obama Administration, I found this line
in the:
ABORTION PROVISIONS IN THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

"There is no requirement in ACA that health care plans cover abortion,
nor is there a prohibition preventing plans from covering abortion. Rather, ACA gives health care plans participating in state exchanges the ability to determine whether or not to cover abortion
services."

So they answer is yes...and no. Then blame it on the Republicans.

Friday, September 28, 2012

PANTS ON FIRE

This ad is unbelievable because it's chocked full of blatant lies. I've chosen the juiciest ones for you.




1. "When I took office we were losing nearly 800,000 jobs a month..."

It happened ONE month and was less than 700K. Actually, unemployment skyrocketed AFTER Obama took office, reaching over 10% ten months after his inauguration in October. Blame Bush for that? No way. During Bush's presidency, unemployment was about 5% on the average.

2. "Reduce our deficit by four trillion dollars over the next decade ON TOP OF THE ONE TRILLION WE ALREADY CUT."

The man has no shame. Cut spending? He SPENT six trillion and cut nothing - yet. Obama plans to cut $109 billion as a first down payment on more than one trillion on spending cuts over a decade. Those are to be divided equally between domestic and defense programs. Yes, you read that right - DEFENSE. He plans to cut from one of our rights listed in the 'Bill of Rights'. In a time when the middle east is exceptionally volatile, that is the absolute last place he should cut from. That's Obama for you.

3. "We'll cut our oil imports in half and produce more American-made energy, oil, clean-coal, and natural gas."

Is he kidding? Does he think we're all idiots? We all know Obama is closing 175 coal plants (which means the President is killing thousands of jobs). He sent our oil rigs from the gulf to Brazil, promising to be their best customers. We had the opportunity get an abundance of oil AND create thousands of jobs with the Keystone pipeline. He refused to consider it now and then lied about it. Mr. Obama is far too comfortable about lying..

The tall-tales Barack Obama has been known to yack about are insulting to the intelligence. His deception is downright immoral.


The truth is, many people will not be able to keep their present doctor or insurance. The promise of the law lowering health care premiums was also a lie. Insurance premiums have gone up rapidly under the law. In most cases, costs have gone up while benefits have decreased. The average family pays more than two thousand dollars more per year since the law was passed.
 

It will be devastating to seniors; they will lose most. Obama has often looked straight into the camera and promised seniors they have nothing to worry about.That is difficult to believe since Obamacare cuts over seven-hundred billion from Medicare to help pay for Obamacare. Medicare won't be able to pay as much any mot t-medical care and doctors visits.

First of all, Medicare will pay pay less per doctor visit. Many doctors don't accept Medicare as it is. My doctor's office has a sign hanging in the lobby. It asks seniors to contact their Congressman, demanding a repeal of Obamacare. The sign explains they cannot possibly accept a smaller payment payment from Medicare.
Secondly, the government has hired panels to evaluate cases. These panels will decide what care each patient can receive. This is where rationing comes in. Seniors will be the first to be denied care because of their age. As the Wall Street Journal reported:

"Elderly Americans are turning out in droves to fight ObamaCare, and President Obama is arguing back that they have nothing to worry about. Allow us to referee. While claims about euthanasia and "death panels" are over the top, senior fears have exposed a fundamental truth about what Mr. Obama is proposing: Namely, once health care is nationalized, or mostly nationalized, rationing care is inevitable, and those who have lived the longest will find their care the most restricted."

The new health care law is a disaster. The Obama administration is still lying about it. It is sad when we remember America probably has had the best health care. The medical field has been creating a system where each patient would get individualized care - unique to each person. Now we will be forced into a government pool with long waits, mediocre care and a panel of taxmen making life and death decisions for us.



We cannot give up though.  We may have lost the election in 2012, leaving many

of feeling defeated. We have to vote members to congress who will represent the
people, not the elitists who have taken over Washington, DC.

 

Monday, February 27, 2012

Elitists Just Don't Get it

Obama has said that he wants everyone to go to college.
I cannot disagree more. Some people just aren't college material.
That doesn't make them less intelligent. I have always said that.
I lived in an era where many of my High School friends did not
go to college. College was for the kids that got scholarships.
College was for the intellectuals and not everyone is an intellectual.

Some people are better off fixing things, manufacturing things
managing people. America needs mechanics, we need seamstresses,
we need people who can repair things. Many of us have parents
who never went to college and they still succeeded in acquiring the "American
Dream". Obama wants to take those chances away from us.

I was never blessed with children and quite frankly,
maybe that was best for me. I cannot see spending a hundred grand
to send my kid to a school where they teach biased politics and ideology.

There is also the flip side.
Let's face it, college is just a big party to some kids. They go, squeak by
and get indoctrinated by liberal professors


I think Santorum says it better than I can.
(I wish he would lose that sweater vest for good)

Friday, February 17, 2012

I Can See November From My House

Here we are at last; after three, long years, we're finally in the midst of choosing our 2012 nominee. Many of us have been counting the months, weeks and days until we could vote Barack Obama out of the White House.

One problem though; it's our candidates. During these tumultuous times, you would think the GOP would have offered us some truly charismatic candidates.  Well, some have had their moments, but I had hoped for a lot more. This is Barack Obama, after all. This is the "anointed one", the mortal who promised to "slow the oceans" and "heal the planet". And the most promising the GOP could offer us was Mitt Romney?  After five years of campaigning, you'd think if he was such a winner, he would do better than about 33% in the primaries. Romney is consistent though - 28 - 38% of eligible voters like him.

Seems like every time a candidate comes close to pushing Mitt Romney out of his front runner position, that candidate gets mutilated in the press. Those Democrats don't know when to quit! Problem is, it wasn't the Democrats. Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich have both been publicly humiliated for past, alleged indiscretions. Herman Cain bowed out gracefully, but Gingrich continues to hang on.

In my humble opinion, the GOP establishment has already decided on the nominee for the people --
Mitt Romney. Unfortunately, Romney isn't Conservative enough for much of the Republican base. He has flip-flopped on a lot of important issues. Oh and there is that pesky, Healthcare Law he passed in Massachusetts when he was governor. Many voters wonder how Romney is going to attack Obama on his Healthcare Law when it was copied from Romney's version. That could be a problem, yet the GOP establishment keeps telling the masses -- Romney is the man who can beat Obama. Not everyone is convinced.

The term "unelectable" has been used a lot lately. It's funny that one "unelectable" candidate, Rick Santorum is giving golden boy, Mitt Romney a run for his money. And money is something Romney has a lot of, both personally and in his campaign fund. In addition to the GOP establishment bashing the "Unelectables", Romney has an enormous amount of cash in his campaign fund. Every time a different candidate surges in the polls, Romney's supporters attack with a barrage of negative, super PAC ads. Gingrich actually won a primary in South Carolina with Romney placing in the the number two spot. Recently, Gingrich has been showing in dead last according to most polls.

I find it troublesome that the guy with the most money determines the nominee. If money is the deciding factor when it comes to the president-elect, Republicans are screwed. Obama has raised approximately one billion in campaign funds. Just imagine the ads we'll see coming from Obama's camp. Besides the half-truths, fuzzy math and blatant lies we've gotten accustomed to, we can also expect the usual attacks from the left. We have already seen a great deal of attacks on the right--from the right!

Republican candidates have spent more time smearing each other rather than enlightening Americans about the true commander-in-chief. We don't need to make things easier for the Democrats. More importantly, we are saturated with a biased media that spews positive, Obama propaganda. In this day and age, if you don't have a computer or Fox news, you have no idea what is going on.

As I wrote earlier, it's been interesting. As for myself, I have chosen a couple of surging Republicans who fell victim of the GOP's public lynching and Romney's attack-PAC. Since then, I have decided to keep my preferences to myself. It is crucial we win this election, more than ever before. I've decided to keep my mouth shut and my keyboard idle when it comes to my feelings about Romney.

We need to pull together in order to win the 2012, Presidential election. Most of us know that four more years of Barack Obama will leave this country unrecognizable. To the surprise of many, George Soros did an interview where he consoled liberals concerned about Obama losing to Romney.  Soros, the very liberal "entrepreneur" and self-proclaimed "god" said that if Romney were elected, there wasn't much to fear. He wouldn't be much different than Obama. (Yikes!)

Yes, it certainly has been interesting.




Monday, January 16, 2012

The Obama Administration - "Are you better off than you were four years ago?"

While looking back over the past few years that Barack Obama was elected "President", I find myself asking a question from over three decades ago. Ronald Reagan was running against incumbent president, Jimmy Carter. During a televised debate, Ronald Reagan asked his audience, "Are you better off than you were four years ago?"




Presently, my personal answer to that question is a definite "no!". But maybe your experience is different than mine. I thought I would take a look at the events of the Obama presidency thus far. Let's weigh the good with the bad.

It was 2009 when Barack Obama was sworn in as president. Unemployment was at 5% and our $1.2 Trillion dollar deficit was troublesome. Every American agreed we needed a strong leader. Many Americans saw a great leader in Obama. I felt he lacked experience to handle the most difficult job in the world. Even worse, the experience he did have included some very, shady characters. As Obama gained in popularity, more and more skeletons tumbled out of his closet. The mainstream media looked the other way.

Bill Ayers was one of them, an unrepentant, home-grown terrorist from the 60's. Additionally, Obama had business dealings with Chicago fund raiser and restaurateur, Tony Rezko. Rezko had recently been convicted of several counts of fraud, , money laundering and he spent twenty years in a church where controversial minister, Rev. Wright preached. Wright was not shy about his anti-American sentiments. There was no shortage of video displaying the good Reverend damning America and calling for reparations. Even Obama's family was questionable. His grandparents and mother were at best, Marxists sympathizers. They attended a known Marxist church and provided young Obama with a Marxist mentor.

Once elected, Obama appointed some very controversial as advisers: Van Jones, a self admitted "Marxist", Cass Sunstein, a professor of law with some very radical ideas and his wife, Samantha Power who is equally radical.
These types of associations were never tolerated in a candidate running for president before.

In 1988, front-runner, Gary Hart was photographed with a hot blonde on his lap and his political career was over. Now we had a candidate who admitted to seeking out friendships with Marxist professors and for some reason, the media seemed to look the other way. Anyone questioning Obama's integrity was labeled a racist. Logic was not important anymore. Most of the country was behind Obama and his plan to spread the wealth in America. I will say, the man could give a moving speech. I would look at the faces in the crowd and they looked like they were under a spell or something. I've heard of charismatic leaders before, but I had never witnessed such unfounded loyalty in my lifetime.

Ninety-nine percent of the media were under that same spell. I was afraid for my country. I felt powerless as I watched everyone bending over backwards for Candidate Obama - including his opponent, John McCain. In spite of my fears, I had no choice but to give the guy a chance. I echoed Dennis Miller's sentiment, "We lost the battle so let's give the cat a chance. Let's see what he can do."

Less than a month after his inauguration, Obama signed the very expensive Stimulus Bill into law. After promising not to include earmarks for special interest groups, American citizens learned there were nearly 9000 earmarks in the bill. Adding insult to injury, it was discovered that the Apollo Alliance, a special interest group in itself, actually wrote the bill. The Apollo Alliance is funded by the Tides Foundation - an organization that provides fiscal sponsorship for progressive groups. George Soros is a major donor and probably a founder.
 
So right off the bat, Obama showed America that he was not interested in bipartisan legislation. His alliance with leftist-progressives exposed his desire for a much bigger government than America was meant to have. Why did the Apollo Alliance write the bill? And why was the bill so cumbersome and difficult to understand? President Obama promised transparency; what good was transparency when the bill so long and confusing? I later learned this was just one of several bills the Apollo Alliance would contribute to our new administration.

By May 2009, our economy did not seem to be improving. Unemployment had jumped to a whopping 9.4%. The Stimulus Plan was questioned; people were beginning to fear that the Obama administration wasted $787 billion. The president gave several speeches, telling us that the new law definitely was helping. I didn't see it; many didn't see it. Everywhere I looked, there were established, small businesses closing their doors. An eerie quiet fell over parking lots at shopping malls all over the country. They were nearly empty.

There was news of a new bill in Congress, the "Cap and Trade" bill. We later learned the Apollo Alliance also wrote that one too. It shed a light on an ambiguous comment then Barack Obama made in January 2008,
"...Under my plan of the Cap and Trade System, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."


Cap and Trade proved to be the worst scam ever to be introduced to Congress - a tax on greenhouse gases. It was a horrible time to even suggest such a tax. This was the worst recession since the 70s. Some even called it another "Depression". The Obama administration kept telling America that the economy was improving. Their words didn't mirror the reality. The economy was struggling and unemployment soared to over 10%. How could they introduce such a job-killing bill now? There was a promise of "green jobs" but no one really knew what green jobs were. The super-Democratic majority passed the bill in the House, but it would not pass in the Senate. The reason? Most say that too many senators were up for reelection the following year. A vote for Cap & Trade would surely kill their campaigns. I say we dodged a bullet.

Meanwhile in the background, a grass roots movement began to stir. They were Americans - a lot of Americans who used to accept government and their crooked ways. This time, government was going to far. There was another bill introduced to Congress and this one was for government-run health care. More and more, mostly middle-class, Conservative citizens began holding their own meetings. Most were never the type to protest or go to rallies; they had to go to work and take care of their families. They called themselves the Tea Party, partly in reference to the original Boston Tea Party and partly for the acronym of "Taxed Enough Already". The movement ignited and spread across the country. Although most people knew that much of the government was corrupt already, it was different this time.

With the help from talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and Glenn Beck, Americans were learning that their American liberty was at stake. These Tea Party members understood what Obama meant when he said, "We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America". He really wanted to TRANSFORM America and if they didn't do something to stop him, he would.


Thank goodness for the Tea Party. Thanks to their efforts, Republicans swept the election in 2010. After dealing with a Democratic, Super-Majority for over a year, America saw what to expect if they didn't act quickly. The 2010 election sent a message to the Democrats, "You are there to represent our interests, not yours!"
We won control over the House -- and quite a few more seats in the Senate too.

The majority of Americans were not happy with the way they shoved their new, health care law down our throats. With a Republican majority in the House, we once again had some power in Washington.

It goes to show you, you can make a difference. There is power and safety in numbers.
We can make a difference if we stick together. We have got to vote Barack Obama out of the White House. He was never properly vetted in the first place.

I'm 57 years old and I am a widow.

I am a widow now. I'm 57 years old and I am a widow. I cannot explain the shock you experience when you find your husband dead. Our ma...